Showing posts with label astrology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label astrology. Show all posts

Sunday, April 1, 2018

Scientists discover new astrological sign

NASA scientist Ben Capricorn announced today the discovery of a thirteenth sign of the zodiac, which has been tentatively named Naivius the Confounder. The constellation for this sign differs from all others in that it spans the entire 360 degree sky.

Naivius the Confounder is obvious, once you see it

Dr. Capricorn explained that he was studying anomalies in horoscopes, people who did not match their signs. "I had been pondering a blog post by John the Math Guy which showed that the signs of the zodiac are useless in predicting mathematical genius. It suddenly occurred to me that there must be another celestial influence which has some effects that were not seen by Ptolemy, who codified these laws a millennium or so ago." Dr. Capricorn theorized that the influence must have been from heavenly bodies that were not known at the time of the discovery of astrology.

Dr. Ben Capricorn of NASA's Office of Space

So, Capricorn petitioned NASA for time on the Hubble telescope to peer deeply into the twelve constellations to find occult stars that might explain the anomalies. Simon Rasputin, director of the Government Office of Pseudoscience applauds this effort. "Capricorn's work is far beyond anything that cosmologists have been able to piece together with all their silly-talk about black holes and the red shift and the big bang and all that stuff. It make so much more sense to group stars that are billions of light years apart into constellations [rather than group them according to the groups of stars that are near together and which rotate about a common center of mass.]  Mystical forces are way more better than dumb equations."

Capricorn's theory was proven true. He was able to find minor stars which correspond to each of the anomalous mathematicians who were not Virgos, as all real math guys should be. These minor stars together form the constellation Naivus the Confounder.

This confirmation of Dr. Capricorn's theory is just the start of this momentous task. "I have already applied for a grant to continue this work. For the project, I will investigate the horoscopes of each and every one of the 7.4 billion people on the Earth, and find an occult star among the hundreds of billions of stars to explain why 91.7% of all people don't fit their horoscope. The project is staggering in it's proportions, but the ultimate benefit to humankind is immeasurable."

Sunday, May 8, 2016

What does Rx mean?

I was out to dinner the other night with my friend Bill. We were celebrating his retirement as a pharmacist. Just to be clear - I am not talking about my friend, Bill the Pharmacist who retired a year ago. Or my friend Linda the Pharmacist who also retired a year ago. Nor am I talking about my friend David, who hasn't said anything about retirement. Yet.

You can draw your own conclusions about why I have so many friends who are pharmacists. I will explain it as mere coincidence.

I don't know how the topic came up, but someone asked where the symbol "Rx" came from. Bill said it was an abbreviation for the Latin word for "recipe". The "x" on the tail of the "R" designates an abbreviation.

Inserting the Rx symbol in Word

For those who like simple answers to life's important questions, please feel free to accept that as your version of the truth. But for people like me, there always has to be a more contorted answer to simple questions. Here's what I told Bill.

It goes back to Hippocrates

Most everyone remembers Hippocrates. I'm not talking about that one character from some sitcom or other. I am talking about the Father of Medicine, the guy who is famous for the Hippocratic Oath.

Hippocrates taught that each part of the body is ruled over by one of the signs of the zodiac, as we see in the illustration below. Aries governs the head, Taurus governs the throat, as so on. Naturally, to understand how to care for the sick, a physician must understand astrology. Hippocrates had this to say about astrology: "A physician without a knowledge of Astrology has no right to call himself a physician." No kidding. He really said that.

The signs of the Zodiac calling dibs on this unfortunate fellow

This advice made it into the early Renaissance. 

Paracelsus (1493 - 1541) was a physician and philosopher who broke with Aristotle's view that we could discover truth by just thinking about things and making stuff up. Paracelsus taught that observation was more important than the dogma of the ancient Greeks. But he was stilled chained to the past in terms of astrology: 

“[Paracelsus] taught the doctrine of the microcosm and the macrocosm that forced the physician to become astrologer.”
(The Scientific Revolution 1500 – 1800, A. R. Hall, p. 133)

One historian tells us that Hippocrates' edict was alive and well in the early Renaissance.

“Between astrology and medicine, however, strong ties existed. The heavenly bodies were universally believed to influence human as well as other sublunary bodies: the good physician was supposed to always take astral influences … into account.”
(Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine, Nancy Siraisi, p. 67)

Another historian is even more strident.

“Astrology also became closely associated with the practice of medicine: no reputable physician of the later Middle Ages would have imagined that medicine could be successfully practiced without it.” 
(The Beginnings of Western Science, David Lindberg, p. 279)

Here is yet another historian who tells us of how medicine was practice in medieval times:

“The progress of the planets, especially the Moon, was charted over succeeding days, with little or no observation of the patient himself, indeed the staunchest astrologer-physicians would claim that they did not even need to see the patient.”
(Astrology, A History, Peter Whitfield, p. 174)

Doing the patient's astrological chart was even more important than seeing the patient? Imagine that. I would hope that most of the readers of this blog find this at least a little bit absurd. 

I have written about the signs of mathematicians, and the signs of politically active rock stars. In both of these incredibly astute blog posts, I showed no correlation whatsoever between someone's sign of the zodiac and their proclivities. If you have read these blogs, you will likely have guessed that I don't rush to open my paper every day to read my horoscope. If you guessed that, you would be correct. I don't get the paper.

Belief in astrology reached a peak in the early 1600's, when techniques for predicting the positions of the planets were rediscovered. Thus we see many early scientists earning money through casting horoscopes.


“Like Kepler, Tycho stood with one foot in the past and was devoted to both alchemy and astrology. Like Kepler, he became a court astrologer and had to waste much of his time with the casting of horoscopes for patrons and friends; like Kepler, he did it with his tongue in his cheek, despised all other astrologers and quacks, and yet was profoundly convinced that the stars influenced man’s character and destiny though nobody quite knew how.”
(The Sleepwalkers, A History of Man's Changing Vision of the Universe, Arthur Koestler, p. 291)


I actual did an old-school search for the quotes above!

Mystic pseudo-science eventually gave way to true science as medical science began to provide demonstrable physical explanations for why we get sick. 

So what about the Rx symbol?!?!

Planets generally travel in one direction with respect to the stars. When a planets is on the other side of the Sun from us, the relative motion reverses and the planet appears to "flow upstream". When this happens, we say that the planet is in retrograde.  

In astrology, this is generally not considered a good thing. In particular, the astrological websites seem pretty unanimous about this being a particularly inauspicious time for surgery:


As an aside, this is a theory that could be quite readily tested, it would seem. Funny... despite the fact that the retrograde surgery problem is (apparently) well established in the astrological community, I am unable to find any direct tests of this. This is proof that the medical community is nefariously putting our health at risk strictly to make lots of money. Or maybe the lack of published research shows that the whole idea is preposterous nonsense.

Below we see a horoscope. I have circled two places where the symbol for retrograde have been used. The upper red circle shows the Rx symbol next to the symbol for Jupiter. The lower red circle shows the symbol for Venus with this symbol. This means that both Jupiter and Venus were in retrograde at this time. Rx is an abbreviation for "retrograde".

 Somebody's horoscope 
 
Thus, the Rx symbol is frequently found as part of the normal work that was performed by doctors around 1600. I haven't quite come up with an explanation for why astrologer/doctor/pharmacists picked this particular symbol to be the symbol for pharmacy. I will work on fabricating some sort of nonsense to explain that. In the mean time, if you are planning on surgery, avoid it when Mars or Venus is in retrograde.

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

It's in the Rock Stars

I wrote a blog post two years ago on the topic of astrology. I looked at the prevalence of the signs of the zodiac for 189 mathematicians born between 1800 and 1840. Now I would think that mathematicians would tend to share certain personality traits. If there is anything to the standard zodiacal theory (that your sign of the zodiac determines your personality), then mathematicians should tend to have one astrological sign.




My research on mathematicians showed that there was no predominant sign of the zodiac associated with this group of mathematicians. They were pretty much evenly distributed across the zodiac. Note to self: Someone's birth sign can be used to predict their personality, except if they happen to be a mathematician born between 1800 and 1840.

One of the readers of this blog threw down the gauntlet, offering up one group of people who fit with their astrological predictions. Here is the comment: 

Hi
I have noticed that famous musicians that are just as famous for their politics as they are for their music are overwhelmingly Libras.
The only exception is the guy from U2.
Here are some:
John Lennon
Thom Yorke
Bruce Springsteen
There also seem to be an almost total lack of Scorpio musicians unless you count vanilla ice.
Aries musicians tend to make exciting music.

I missed a couple of example:
Sting -Mr Rainforest
Bob Geldof - Feed the world

Most musicians who are famous for their politics seem to be libra. But not all libra musicians are publicly political.

<Posted by Chunkations>

On reading this list, my first thought was ... what about the other Beatles? John Lennon wasn't the only one of them making a peace sign. Then, since I am a child of that era, a long list of other names came to mind: Bob Dylan, Pete Seeger, Peter, Paul, and Mary...

The Experiment

I decided to test Chunkation's hypothesis. I sent a Facebook message to each of my 16 friends, all of whom are into music. Note that I copied the words from the Chunkations'  comment directly. I did not try to spin my own interpretation of Chunkations' words, and I did not tell people what I planned on doing with the list.

I'm asking people for a little help with a future blog post. I am compiling a list of famous musicians that are just as famous for their politics as they are for their music. Could you nominate the five who you think are most qualified?

13 of the friends gave me their list. (To be perfectly honest, one of my friends was me. Another was my wife, who sometimes is my friend.) The combined list included 38 different musicians.

I had to do a little editing. Some people offered more than five. People just can't follow directions, you know? I went back and asked them to pick five from the list, or I just took the first five from their list.

Many people offered up music groups. People just can't follow directions, you know? Rage Against the Machine got three votes! Not sure what to do, I went to Wikipedia and used the name of the first group member that was listed. I tabulated with and without these.

Here is a list of all the musicians, a count of the number of people who mentioned them, and their birthday (according to Wikipedia) and their sign, according to the Zodiac table on Wikipedia.

Artist Count  Bday Sign
Country Joe McDonald 1 1-Jan Capricorn
Joan Baez 4 9-Jan Capricorn
Zack de la Rocha (Rage Against the Machine) 3 12-Jan Capricorn
Bob Marley 2 6-Feb Aquarius
Cheryl Crow 1 11-Feb Aquarius
Buffy Saint-Marie 1 20-Feb Pisces
Harry Belafonte 1 1-Mar Pisces
Miriam Makeba 1 4-Mar Pisces
Dee Snyder 1 15-Mar Pisces
Brian Warfield (The Wolfe Tones) 1 2-Apr Aries
Al Green 1 13-Apr Aries
Barbra Streisand 2 24-Apr Taurus
Willie Nelson 1 29-Apr Taurus
Pete Seeger 4 3-May Taurus
Richie Furay (Buffalo Springfield) 1 9-May Taurus
Bono 5 10-May Taurus
Bob Dylan 4 24-May Gemini
Bruce Cockburn 1 27-May Gemini
Peter Yarrow 1 31-May Gemini
Audra McDonald 1 3-Jul Cancer
Arlo Guthrie 1 10-Jul Cancer
Woodie Guthrie 2 14-Jul Cancer
Serj Tankian 1 21-Aug Leo
Beyonce 1 4-Sep Virgo
Chrissy Hynde 1 7-Sep Virgo
Ani DiFranco 1 23-Sep Libra
Bruce Springsteen 2 23-Sep Libra
Sting 1 2-Oct Libra
John Mellencamp 1 7-Oct Libra
John Lennon 4 9-Oct Libra
Martie Maguire (Dixie Chicks) 1 12-Oct Libra
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova (Pussy Riot) 1 7-Nov Scorpio
Neil Young 1 12-Nov Scorpio
Aaron Copeland 1 14-Nov Scorpio
Kevin Gilbert 1 20-Nov Scorpio
Ted Nugent 4 13-Dec Sagittarius
Eddie Veder (Pearl Jam) 1 23-Dec Capricorn
Odetta 1 31-Dec Capricorn

Here is the count for each of the signs. The first column is the sign. The second column is the count including the music groups, and the third column is the count leaving out Pussy Riot and the other groups.

Capricorn 5 3
Aquarius 2 2
Pisces 4 4
Aries 2 1
Taurus 5 4
Gemini 3 3
Cancer 3 3
Leo 1 1
Virgo 2 2
Libra 6 5
Scorpio 4 3
Sagittarius 1 1

Are the folks in this list "overwhelmingly" Libras? Somehow I picture "overwhelmingly" to mean something like "most of". Like if 30 of the 38 were Libras, then I would be overwhelmed.


How about the softer claim at the end of the blog comment? "Most musicians who are famous for their politics seem to be libra." I think "most" would mean at least 20. Hmmm... there were only 6.

There are more Libras (6) than there are any other group, but that's not saying much, statistically. There are 5 each of Capricorns and Tauruses. Even if we exclude the music groups (where I might have erred) the story is the same.

So, the experiment failed to support even a much weaker version of Chunkation's hypothesis.

Is the data skewed by non-famous people? Hmmm... There are more than a few people on the list that I have to admit I never heard of. How can they be famous?

I came up with the A list of those people who were nominated by more than one person. And I also left out those who were mentioned only by the band name. Ten people were left: Baez, Marley, Streisand, Seeger, Bono, Dylan, Guthrie, Springsteen, Lennon, and Nugent. I count only one Libra in this group. There are three Tauruses, though.

I think this pretty well busts that myth.

Thank you Anne, Betsy, Dave, Doug, Gringo, John, Madelaine, Mike, Paul, Rachel, Steve, Toby, and Tom for volunteering your lists of famous musicians and activists.

In conclusion

What does this say for the theory that your sign of the zodiac predicts stuff about you and your life?

Someone may well post on this blog that 93% of all left-handed cab drivers in Queens are Pisces. (Or maybe they are just pissed?)  I imagine that such a post might end with something like "How can you explain that, Mr. Smarty Math Guy Pants!!??!??"

A theory is useful if it can make predictions. I have given two examples where the birth sign makes absolutely lousy predictions, so it is not useful, and perhaps even harmful. In order for the theory to hope to prove itself useful, it has to include an instruction manual that tells me how to avoid making these two bad predictions. Until I have that manual, I have to assume that the whole theory is not useful.

But there is an odd thing about Springsteen...

I noticed one interesting thing comparing Chunkations' list with my own list. He/she listed Springsteen as a Libra. I initially counted my pal Bruce as a Virgo. I double checked Wikipedia's entry on Zodiac for the date range for the signs, and saw that I didn't mess up. It lists Virgo as August 23rd to September 23rd, and the Boss was born on Sept. 23. By that definition, I was correct.


But then I looked further... The Wikipedia page for Virgo tells a slightly different story: "[T]he Sun transits this area on average between August 23 and September 22". By this definition, Springsteen falls into the Libra camp along with Mellencamp.

So I started furiously googling. I found 21 website that gave a definition of the date range for Libra, and there were four different date ranges associated with Libra. There was one website (I won't tell which one) that contradicted itself about the date range for Libra. On the same page.

Why the confusion? The transitions between the signs of the zodiac are defined based on the position of the Sun and Earth with respect to one another and the stars, and also on what part of the globe you were born on. Springsteen (and Ani DiFranco) were born on a cusp, the edge between two birth signs. They could go either way.

Incidentally, when I did my analysis before, the count of six Libras included Springsteen and DiFranco. With a slightly different definition of Libra, the count of correct guesses would have been only four.  

The hidden meaning of "What's your sine?"

Time for a little math history trivia. I thought my little pun on "What's my sine?" was cute. But it later occurred to me that there was another little twist.

Long ago, people invented astrology as a way to help explain the world and make predictions about whether to go to war or just throw a big block party. This perceived need fostered early astronomers to take detailed notes on the positions of the moon, the stars and the planets.

The astronomers had all this data, but they needed something to do with it. They needed to develop math to be able to predict the future positions of the celestial bodies. Consequently, trigonometry was invented. And it was invented almost a millennium before algebra. So there is another connection between the words "sign" and "sine".